provision5

It was most clear to me that there was a great deal of confusion in matters pertaining to the interpretation of the laws by enforcement bodies (municipal, provincial, and/or engineering, etc.) and AS A FORMER CODE TESTER, had the trial been allowed to proceed instead of my having been given a "kangaroo court" by a deputy judge and/or regulators (municipal, provincial and/or engineering) who in my opinion did not want the issues heard and/or documented have EASILY shown th, I could have easily explained the issues and shown that laws are misinterpreted and/or not followed by enforcement bodies, that Building Inspectors Are NOT engineers, that engineers are NOT code testers and/or lawyers (and as such, they should have, in my opinion, pushed back on the Ministry in matters of the enforcement of the Engineering Act when it appeared to be colliding with the Building Code Act and issues arose in 2007 necessitating the writing of the infamous "Smoking Gun Letter" by the Professional Engineers of Ontario to the Ontario Building Officials Association!!! The FACT that the court did NOT allow the trial to proceed, in my opinion, only further aggravated the situation as no one was held accountable and issues were not addressed and documented in a legal public forum which would have allowed the creation of precedents for what is clearly a huge building code enforcement fiasco!

Instead of allowing issues to be heard and documented and the setting of precedents, the "court" - or in my opinion- more correctly - the "kangaroo court" - chose to further victimize the victim and hit my family with a $5,000.00 fee for the attorneys of the defense because we had forced the issue to court rather than settling out of court, which, in our opinion, would have been to virtually "hush the issues completely"! The court transcript clearly documents my complete and total disagreement with the "deputy judge" as I clearly informed her I would now have to run for mayor in order to expose the issues so many were trying so hard to hide - something my conscience simply could not allow. By doing what it did, the "court", in my opinion, completely violated my right to freedom of conscience as guaranteed by the Constitution of Canada! Because of our "kangaroo court", issues were not raised and documented, precedents were not set, persons who should have been held accountable were allowed to "walk", victims were further victimized and in my opinion, intimidated by the court with "fines in the form of legal fees for the defense" as "warnings not to abuse the system" [or, in my opinion, dare bring this to court again] ... and the "system" continues as it always has... with structures going up with major structural defects and with enforcement bodies KNOWING they have some HUGE problems... and liabilities ahead!

A GOOD LAW FIRM WILLING TO TAKE OUR CASE SURE WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE... BUT WE WERE - AND ARE - THE LONE "DAVID" FACING MANY A GOLIATH!