The "Courts"... A JUDGMENT ALTERED 3 DAYS AFTER THE TRIAL WAS OVER!!!

ALTERED 3 DAYS AFTER TRIAL ENDED to "dismiss claims" agains the engineer - without a single argument/comment heard "at trial" - A new date is NOT on new altered judgment and this is NOT in the public transcript of the trial either - even though this new document makes it "look" like this was there "at trial date"... when it most certainly was not - as the transcript itself clearly shows! CLICK HERE TO SEE FULL PUBLIC TRANSCRIPT ( See p. 22-23 - Open With Adobe Reader...) - An official document "modified after the fact"... Was this also not "an issue" in the Elliot Lake Inquiry? Shall we hold the courts to the same standard as that imposed on Bob Woods in Elliot Lake when it comes to "modifiying documents after the fact"?