12) Since Alpine Systems had paid $10,000.00 of the judgment owed to me by Marc Levasseur and M.G.L. Drafting and Consulting (PER THE TRIAL JUDGMENT), and since "all claims had been dismissed against Augusto Vertolli, engineer who sealed our truss drawings and "non-settling party", and employee of Alpine Systems), in order for proper "tax reporting", would Marc Levasseur not have to declare the $10,000.00 paid to me by Alpine Systems as "income" on his (Marc Levasseur's tax returns) given the funds had been given to me for him by Alpine Systems? This BEGS the question: "Why did Alpine Systems pay me anything since they wereNOT part of the lawsuit and since "all claims against Augusto Vertolli were dismissed" [without a single comment and/or argument heard in court]. Alpine Systems and/or Augusto Vertolli were NOT the ones who were supposed to pay me per the trial judgment... so... again... why did Alpine Systems insist on putting itself "in the middle" "behind the scenes" - AGAIN? Had I not scanned this check from Alpine Systems, no one would have been any wiser to what were in my opinion very questionable tactics "behind the scenes". I wonder what stockholders would think of all this - espcially since Alpine Systems was NOT even a defendant in the lawsuit!!!

13) Unlucky #13... Likewise, would the Securities and Exchange Commission not require that Alpine Systems and MiTek not have to "disclose" to shareholders a potential "material fact" in these matters - specifically, that they may be liable for damages incurred as a result of their truss design engineering software which, at least in the case of Alpine Systems, in my own case, allowed for the design of truss placement guide with a design flaw on it which had resulted in a major structural defect in our home. Given my ONE truss sales rep had admitted to having done "hundreds of scissor truss jobs all framed the same way", would this not be considered a "material fact" for shareholders of both Alpine Systems (parent = IL Tool Works) and MiTek (parent = Berkshire Hathaway) since that software had also been used in the past by my truss sales rep and one that should be disclosed in financial statements and/or to the financial regulators given the potential impact to stockholders and/or the company stock?
The Golden "Hidden Precedent"... And What I Can Only Call... "POETIC JUSTICE"...
A CRITICAL HIDDEN PRECEDENT??? A POTENTIAL GOLDEN NUGGET FOR SO MANY!!!
 One The Court Itself And High Powered Global Law Firm Attorneys
May Not Have Seen In The "Rushed Decision" And/Or "Rush To Settle..." Imposed Upon Me By The Court!!!