documentation2

The Unbelievable Outcome... NOT Disclosed
In The Public TRIAL Transcript and ADDED to the judgement 3 DAYS AFTER "THE TRIAL" WAS OVER!
Unethical? Illegal?
Note: A Transcript CAN NOT be modified "after the fact". It MUST represent "the trial discussions". If the transcript CAN NOT by law be modified... How can the wording for the "trial judgment" be altered 3 DAYS AFTER THE TRIAL??

Persons overseeing a trial receive a copy
of the transcript for their review prior to the transcript
being distributed and/or considered "official". As such, any "alterations" to the judgement could have been noted in the public record to at least advise the public that there had been a MOST NOTEWORTHY modification made to the wording of the judgment... but... clearly... in spite of having the opportunity to add such a notation to the public transcript... that was not done!!!

A " TRIAL" Defined...

A " KANGAROO COURT" Defined...

An Objection Filed Over What We Saw As A "Kangaroo Trial" Completely Void of Any Fundamental Justice...

A STRAW MAN Response
(in our opinion... a complete attempt at avoiding the true issues raised in our objection!)

"Court" and Other Documentation... And In Our Opinion... "A Kangaroo Court" Devoid Of Fundamental Justice...
In Spite Of Events At Elliot Lake Mall Collapse...
The "Negligence" Arguments - INDEED NOTHING - Is Allowed To Be Heard In Matters of Public Safety!

The "NOT TO CODE PROPOSED FIXES" we received from the municipality!!!

A HISTORY of this problem at the municipality...

Note: All emphasis and/or comments in documentation are added to help readers understand issues!

My Response Correcting Inaccuracies In What Was In My Opinion A "Straw Man" Response By The Court Oversight Judge! It Was Never Responded To!

Sealed Documents...

Due Diligence Defined...

Bad Faith Defined...

Intent Defined...

Due Process Defined...

Supreme Court - Kamloops v. Nielsen

Supreme Court - On Breach Of Public Trust!

A "Kangaroo Court Trial" And
The VERY UGLY Implications!